A change plan can have a polished timeline and still leave the hardest question unanswered: how will leaders behave when people push back, the answer is uncertain or the deadline slips? Staff experience change through decisions, conversations and promises kept or broken. A communication calendar cannot substitute for those moments. Insights' 2026 research surveyed 880 senior HR and people leaders in 11 markets in May 2026; its publisher reports that 43% of organisations prepared leaders for how to behave during change, the least common of six preparation activities. This is a survey of reported preparation, not proof that training causes productivity gains.
Pressure changes what people see
Under pressure, leaders can narrow attention to speed and control. They may decide alone to save time, avoid a conversation that could be uncomfortable, or communicate only once everything is settled. That may feel efficient from the leader's position. From the team's position, the silence can make it harder to plan and safer to speculate than to ask. This is a plausible mechanism to test in your own setting, not a claim that every leader reacts the same way.
Oreg, Vakola and Armenakis' review of reactions to organisational change shows why the experience of change cannot be reduced to an announcement. Context, the process and individual responses all matter. Participation, clarity and trust therefore deserve attention alongside project milestones. Kotter's work also emphasises leadership and communication in change, but a model is not a substitute for listening to people affected. Insights reports that 96% of surveyed organisations have a framework to discuss leadership behaviour or working styles, while 33% use it consistently and widely. Having a vocabulary is not the same as practising it.
Build this capability in your organisation
Growth Performance designs bespoke programmes that turn insight into measurable behaviour change.
Five behaviours to agree before the difficult week
Explain what is known and unknown. State the decision, the reason and the next point at which you will update people. Do not fill the gaps with certainty you do not have.
Invite challenge before commitment. Ask whose work is affected and what risk the plan overlooks. Name who can change the proposal and what is already fixed.
Keep one-to-ones when the calendar tightens. Change lands differently for different people. A short, consistent conversation is better than waiting for a perfect all-team presentation.
Make a decision owner visible. If feedback cannot affect the outcome, say so honestly; if it can, explain how and when. Repeatedly asking for views without closing the loop damages trust.
Admit and correct a miss. If a promise cannot be kept, explain what changed and what you will do next. Don't outsource accountability to a slide deck.
Rehearse, then measure
For a 30-minute leadership-team exercise, spend five minutes naming the hardest likely question, ten minutes role-playing the answer, ten minutes letting colleagues describe how the answer lands, and five minutes rewriting it. Repeat with a different voice in the room. Agree one peer check-in during the change: “Which of our five behaviours did we maintain, and where did we drift?”
Use the Leading Through Change diagnostic before and after to frame reflection, and the Change Readiness Scan to identify obstacles. Neither is a blind-spot test based on independent team ratings. Ask colleagues for concrete examples of behaviour, protecting confidentiality rather than pretending a small group is anonymous. The change communication planner can help make the update cadence explicit.
Insights Discovery offers a shared language for discussing differences in preferred working styles and how those may show up on a difficult day. Do not use a profile to label someone as incapable of change; ask what they need and what others experience. For facilitated practice, see change management training and the change workshops in the library.