Interactive assessment
Team Stage Assessment
Identify which of four recognised stages of team development your team is currently in, and get a clear picture of what needs to happen next.
One of the most validated frameworks in team psychology identifies four stages that teams move through: Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing. Each stage has distinct characteristics and requires a different leadership response. What helps a Storming team will be counterproductive for a Performing team. This assessment identifies your team's dominant stage and the specific actions that will help you move forward.
- Questions or items
- 20 questions or items
- Completion time
- Around 10 minutes
- Dimensions
- Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing
- What you receive
- Personalised results with configured interpretation bands, section scores and development guidance.
What it covers
- Forming
- Storming
- Norming
- Performing
Rate each statement from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) based on how accurately it describes your team right now. Be honest, identifying the right stage is the foundation of the right development plan.
Results: Personalised results with configured interpretation bands, section scores and development guidance.
How this interactive diagnostic works
This page provides the documented overview before the interactive experience is loaded. It lets you read the purpose, the material covered and the way the result is presented without entering answers or sending a request. When you choose to continue, the interactive version uses the same material shown here. It records your selections while you work and only calculates its result when its required items are complete.
Analytics consent is required before the interactive experience is mounted. Declining consent does not start the diagnostic or its tracking. If you continue, the existing experience remains responsible for its own input, score and lead-capture step. Where the route requests a first name and work email, its existing form handles validation and submission. This overview does not replace those steps or submit a lead.
Statements in this diagnostic
The interactive version groups the statements below by section. Read them in relation to the situation named in the instructions, then use the response scale shown by the diagnostic. The section descriptions are part of the existing configuration and explain the aspect each group is intended to examine.
Forming
Characterised by orientation, polite behaviour, and dependence on the leader. Team members are figuring out what they're doing and who does what.
- Team members are still figuring out their roles and how they fit together as a group
- Interactions are mostly polite and careful, people are still getting to know each other
- The team looks primarily to its leader for direction and decisions
- There is genuine excitement about the team's potential, but also uncertainty about how things will work
- People are cautious about how much of themselves to reveal and how much to trust the group
Storming
Characterised by conflict, competition, and challenge to the leader or each other. This is normal and necessary, but it needs navigating carefully.
- There are underlying tensions or unresolved conflicts that affect how the team works together
- Different team members have competing ideas about how the team should operate or what it should prioritise
- There is some resistance to the team's direction, goals, or leadership, openly expressed or subtly present
- Frustration sometimes surfaces in how team members communicate with each other
- There are informal sub-groups or alliances forming within the team
Norming
Characterised by emerging cohesion, agreed ways of working, and growing trust. The team is finding its rhythm.
- The team has developed agreed ways of working that most people follow without being told to
- Trust is building, people are becoming more comfortable being honest with each other
- Roles and responsibilities are clearer and accepted, with less jostling for position
- The team is developing its own identity and sense of what makes it distinctive
- Collaboration is improving, people are more willing to help each other and share information
Performing
Characterised by high productivity, self-management, and collective ownership of results. The team operates as a cohesive unit.
- The team delivers results consistently and at a high standard without needing constant direction
- Team members manage conflicts and challenges themselves, without always escalating to the leader
- There is a strong sense of collective ownership, the team genuinely works as one unit toward shared goals
- The team adapts effectively to new challenges or changes without losing its effectiveness or cohesion
- Relationships within the team are characterised by trust, respect, and genuine care for each other's success
How the result is read
The interactive diagnostic compares section scores and identifies the highest-scoring section as the current dominant stage. The result uses the interpretation written for that stage and keeps the individual section scores visible.
- Forming, 1 to 25: Your team is in the Forming stage. Focus on building psychological safety, clarifying roles and purpose, and creating early wins that build confidence and cohesion. Strong leader direction is appropriate here.
- Storming, 1 to 25: Your team is in the Storming stage. This is normal and necessary, avoidance makes it worse. The priority is creating structured space for honest conversation, clarifying decision-making processes, and building conflict resolution skills.
- Norming, 1 to 25: Your team is in the Norming stage, good progress. The priority now is consolidating emerging norms, deepening trust through shared challenge, and developing the team's capacity for peer accountability and constructive conflict.
- Performing, 1 to 25: Your team is in the Performing stage, a significant achievement. The focus is on sustaining this through changes in membership, goals, or context; avoiding complacency; and developing the team's capacity to help others reach the same level.
Sources named in this diagnostic
- Hackman, J.R. (2002) Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Katzenbach, J.R. and Smith, D.K. (1993) The Wisdom of Teams. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
- Tuckman, B.W. (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), pp. 384-399.
- Tuckman, B.W. and Jensen, M.A.C. (1977) Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies, 2(4), pp. 419-427.
Where to take the next step
Our team programmes build genuine trust, accountability and sustained high performance.
Explore Team Effectiveness WorkshopsFrequently asked questions
What does the Team Stage Assessment measure?
One of the most validated frameworks in team psychology identifies four stages that teams move through: Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing. Each stage has distinct characteristics and requires a different leadership response. What helps a Storming team will be counterproductive for a Performing team. This assessment identifies your team's dominant stage and the specific actions that will help you move forward.
How many questions are in the Team Stage Assessment?
It contains 20 questions grouped into 4 dimensions: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing.
How is the Team Stage Assessment scored?
The section scores are compared to identify the highest-scoring current stage. The result keeps every stage score visible.
What happens after I complete the Team Stage Assessment?
After the required items are answered, the existing first-name and email gate is shown before the results are displayed. The result includes an overall interpretation, section scores and development guidance.
Related programme
More to explore
You can change your cookie preference at any time by clearing your browser's local storage.