Interactive assessment
Critical Thinking & Cognitive Bias Detector
Assess your capacity to analyse arguments, identify assumptions, reason logically and detect cognitive biases that distort your judgement.
In an age of information overload and AI-generated content, critical thinking is among the most valuable human capabilities. This diagnostic identifies where your thinking is strongest and where biases or reasoning gaps may be affecting your decisions and judgements.
- Questions or items
- 20 questions or items
- Completion time
- Around 10 minutes
- Dimensions
- Argument Analysis, Assumption Identification, Logical Deduction, Bias Awareness & Objectivity
- What you receive
- Personalised results with configured interpretation bands, section scores and development guidance.
What it covers
- Argument Analysis
- Assumption Identification
- Logical Deduction
- Bias Awareness & Objectivity
Rate each statement from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree) based on how consistently and accurately it describes your thinking. Be as honest as possible, the value of this tool depends on self-awareness, not self-promotion.
Results: Personalised results with configured interpretation bands, section scores and development guidance.
How this interactive diagnostic works
This page provides the documented overview before the interactive experience is loaded. It lets you read the purpose, the material covered and the way the result is presented without entering answers or sending a request. When you choose to continue, the interactive version uses the same material shown here. It records your selections while you work and only calculates its result when its required items are complete.
Analytics consent is required before the interactive experience is mounted. Declining consent does not start the diagnostic or its tracking. If you continue, the existing experience remains responsible for its own input, score and lead-capture step. Where the route requests a first name and work email, its existing form handles validation and submission. This overview does not replace those steps or submit a lead.
Statements in this diagnostic
The interactive version groups the statements below by section. Read them in relation to the situation named in the instructions, then use the response scale shown by the diagnostic. The section descriptions are part of the existing configuration and explain the aspect each group is intended to examine.
Argument Analysis
The ability to break down claims, identify evidence and evaluate the strength of an argument is the foundation of critical thinking.
- When I encounter an argument, I look for the evidence supporting it before forming a view
- I can distinguish between a strong argument with weak evidence and a weak argument with compelling delivery
- I look for alternative explanations before accepting the first conclusion that makes sense
- I can identify when a conclusion doesn't logically follow from the premises presented
- I regularly challenge the information I receive, even from authoritative sources, by asking what evidence supports it
Assumption Identification
Uncovering hidden assumptions, in others' thinking and our own, is essential for sound reasoning and good decisions.
- I actively surface the assumptions behind plans and proposals before committing to them
- I can identify when a conclusion depends on an unstated assumption that may not be true
- I regularly examine my own assumptions and test whether they still hold
- I am comfortable asking 'what are we assuming here?' in group discussions without appearing obstructive
- When plans fail, I look at which assumptions proved wrong, not just which actions went wrong
Logical Deduction
Logical reasoning, the ability to draw valid conclusions from available information, underpins effective analysis and decision-making.
- I can follow a chain of reasoning and identify where the logic breaks down
- I am able to hold multiple competing hypotheses in mind and evaluate them simultaneously
- I distinguish between correlation and causation in data and reports I review
- I can construct a well-reasoned argument for a position I personally disagree with
- When I reach a conclusion, I can trace the reasoning path that led me there and explain it clearly
Bias Awareness & Objectivity
Cognitive biases distort judgement in systematic, predictable ways. Awareness of them is the first step to mitigating their effect.
- I am familiar with common cognitive biases (e.g. confirmation bias, anchoring, availability heuristic) and can recognise them in my own thinking
- I actively seek disconfirming evidence, information that challenges what I already believe
- I can identify when I am being influenced by how information is framed rather than its actual content
- When making important decisions, I use a structured process to reduce the influence of intuition and bias
- I notice when group dynamics are suppressing critical thinking and take steps to introduce challenge
How the result is read
The interactive diagnostic totals the selected item scores by section and across the whole assessment. It then matches those totals to the configured interpretation bands and shows the section-level results alongside the overall result.
- Developing, 20 to 44: Significant gaps in critical thinking capability. Start with Bias Awareness, understanding the cognitive shortcuts that distort your thinking is the fastest path to improvement. Even awareness of confirmation bias alone measurably improves decision quality.
- Emerging, 45 to 64: Developing critical thinking capability with clear strengths in some areas. Look at your Assumption Identification score, most Emerging critical thinkers underestimate how many of their plans rest on untested assumptions.
- Capable, 65 to 82: A capable critical thinker. Your analysis is generally sound and your reasoning is structured. To reach Advanced, focus on Logical Deduction, specifically practise identifying when conclusions don't follow from premises in real-world contexts.
- Advanced, 83 to 100: Advanced critical thinking. You are among a small minority who actively question their own assumptions and reasoning in real time. Apply this to your most important recurring decisions, and help others develop the same capacity.
Sources named in this diagnostic
- Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane.
- Paul, R. and Elder, L. (2019) The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. 8th edn. Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
- Thaler, R.H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Where to take the next step
Our human skills programmes develop interpersonal, communication and influence capabilities.
Explore Human Skills ProgrammesFrequently asked questions
What does the Critical Thinking & Cognitive Bias Detector measure?
In an age of information overload and AI-generated content, critical thinking is among the most valuable human capabilities. This diagnostic identifies where your thinking is strongest and where biases or reasoning gaps may be affecting your decisions and judgements.
How many questions are in the Critical Thinking & Cognitive Bias Detector?
It contains 20 questions grouped into 4 dimensions: Argument Analysis, Assumption Identification, Logical Deduction, Bias Awareness & Objectivity.
How is the Critical Thinking & Cognitive Bias Detector scored?
Responses are scored within each section and totalled across the diagnostic. The total is compared with the configured interpretation bands.
What happens after I complete the Critical Thinking & Cognitive Bias Detector?
After the required items are answered, the existing first-name and email gate is shown before the results are displayed. The result includes an overall interpretation, section scores and development guidance.
Related programme
More to explore
You can change your cookie preference at any time by clearing your browser's local storage.